The new morality. Traditional moral fault of the most dramatic is the "Cultural Revolution", advocate the betrayal, turn back to hit those who misled, the whole society is a mutual benefit society. In this case, suddenly and the reform and opening up, China became a merchant Zhuli society. So, in addition to the national problem, also reflect on the social system itself on the traditional culture of the harm, the problem may be in place to consider from the two aspects of. Kong Fuzi speaks of "having a sense of shame Yong", have a slim requirements. For this set of what to do, people to people is not the same, a lot of people really is quite different. But to get publicly stoop degree, is our society in recent decades before the emergence of the situation. The past even if someone do something wrong, bad, he will tell a great truth, to prove that his approach is right, or is in accord with justice. Now many people even the preaching all province, directly open your real, direct black your money, play your people directly, don't tell you what the truth, don't give you what account. This say without mincing words shameless and before that need a loin cloth shameless is not the same, this is completely decadent culture and human nature. The problem of relationship between I often speak of culture and system. I am neither a cultural determinism, nor a system determinism, I think the two are reciprocal causation. In the worst case, they are promoted each other, together pull sinking. The government and the people, the two are often interactive. The more I think we are now facing the problem is actually such a thing. Lenovo to the rights of kneel down phenomenon, it is able to explain the problem. But not only is a traditional culture, but also is the result of education, people are accustomed to kneel down, can not bring up citizen. To reverse a cultural environment, not a year or two things. Siyaomianzi living death, some people can do so many outrageous things, but once people criticize him, there will be all kinds of excuses. I think, from the politician's point of view,ボッテガヴェネタ アウトレット http://www.peckrealty.com/httpdocs/agents/bottega-veneta-t-1108.html, directly admit actually does not lose face, even if is considered from the strategy, things may soon end, the public will accept your apology. Admit mistakes much better effect than lots of. Now the information channel is too rich, say falsehood, whitewash, consequences than immediately admit more miserable, is better than that one, readily admits mistakes, the public can generally understand. It's easy to be influenced by his own cultural environment, left the cultural environment, will be lost to the world. If a person is lying from education, duplicitous education, from kindergarten to
learned to teacher education out of bribery, so if people become officials, will become what can be imagined. He will become a habit, say falsehood, empty talk, see what people say, damn that ghost. For example, the studying in the UK students, because the paper did not, take 5000 pounds bribery of teachers. He had probably seen parents is to do so,シャネル 財布 http://www.impactglasswall.com/images/chanel-baggu-outlet-35018.html, the teacher is so accepted, he came to another cultural environment or in accordance with the original cultural environment in the habit of doing, the result can only be in jail. So don't always emphasize the particularity of China, human beings are common, must pick up
|
